Since its independence, Indonesia has sought to maintain a delicate balance between its many ethnic, religious and linguistic groups. However, the country’s diversity has posed some unique challenges.
One of the most difficult aspects of managing diversity has been accommodating the needs of the country’s largest minority group, the ethnic Chinese. The Chinese began arriving in Indonesia in large numbers in the late 1800s, and they soon became an important part of the economy. However, they also became the target of discrimination and violence. In the late 1960s, anti-Chinese riots left thousands of people dead.
Since then, the Indonesian government has enacted a number of policies to try to protect the rights of the Chinese minority. For example, it has limited the amount of land that can be owned by Chinese citizens, and it has required that all Chinese-owned businesses be registered with the government.
However, these policies have not always been successful. For example, in recent years there have been a number of anti-Chinese riots, most notably in 1998 when thousands of Chinese-owned businesses were destroyed.
The challenge of accommodating Indonesia’s diverse population has also been felt in the religious sphere. Indonesia is a Muslim-majority country, but it also has a large Hindu population. In recent years, there has been a rise in Islamic extremism, and this has led to a number of clashes between Muslims and Hindus.
In addition, Indonesia has a large number of regional languages, and it has been difficult for the government to promote a sense of national identity among all of its citizens. This has been particularly problematic since the 1970s, when the government began to promote a policy of Indonesian nationalism.
Many of the country’s ethnic and religious minorities have felt that they have not been treated fairly, and this has led to a number of protests and demonstrations. In recent years, there has been a growing sense of dissatisfaction among Indonesia’s ethnic and religious minorities, and this could lead to further instability in the future.
Contents
- 1 How did Malaysia’s approach to ethnic diversity differ from Myanmar’s quizlet?
- 2 Why has the Philippines had trouble preserving its democracy quizlet?
- 3 Why did the partition of British India cause a refugee crisis?
- 4 What were the consequences of independence in South Asia for the region and for the world?
- 5 Why did policies toward ethnic diversity lead to prosperity in Malaysia?
- 6 How has Internet technology affected the method by which marriages are arranged among South Asians quizlet?
- 7 How did the Indian government try to improve conditions for lower castes quizlet?
How did Malaysia’s approach to ethnic diversity differ from Myanmar’s quizlet?
Malaysia has a long history of ethnic diversity, with people from a wide range of cultures and religions living together in relative peace. This is in stark contrast to Myanmar, which has a long history of sectarian violence and conflict between different ethnic groups.
One of the main reasons for Malaysia’s success in managing diversity is its strong commitment to secularism. This ensures that people of all faiths are treated equally, and that religion is not used to justify discrimination or violence. In contrast, Myanmar is a Buddhist-majority country, and the government often uses Buddhism to justify discrimination against Muslims.
Another key difference is the way that Malaysia handles its national language. In Malaysia, Bahasa Malaysia is the official language, but it is also spoken by a wide range of different ethnic groups. This means that everyone in Malaysia can communicate in the national language, regardless of their ethnicity or religion. In contrast, Myanmar has a number of different official languages, and it is often difficult for people from different ethnic groups to communicate with each other.
Finally, Malaysia has a strong tradition of multiculturalism, which encourages people from different ethnic groups to celebrate their cultural heritage. This is in contrast to Myanmar, where the government often tries to suppress expressions of ethnic diversity.
Overall, Malaysia’s approach to ethnic diversity is much more successful than Myanmar’s quizlet. Malaysia has managed to create a society where people of all faiths and cultures can live together in peace, while Myanmar has seen a long history of sectarian violence and conflict.
Why has the Philippines had trouble preserving its democracy quizlet?
The Philippines is a country that has had trouble preserving its democracy. There are many factors that have contributed to this, such as the country’s history, its geographical location, and its economic conditions.
The Philippines is a country that has had a troubled history when it comes to democracy. The country became a republic in 1898, after it gained independence from Spain. However, the republic was short-lived, as the Philippines was soon occupied by the United States. The US imposed a military government in the Philippines, which lasted until 1935. In 1935, the Philippines became a self-governing commonwealth, and in 1946, the country became an independent republic. However, the Philippines has had a history of political instability, and has had a number of military governments. The most recent military government in the Philippines was the regime of Ferdinand Marcos, which lasted from 1972 until 1986.
The Philippines is also a country that is located in a very strategic location. The country is located in Southeast Asia, and it is bordered by the South China Sea. This makes the Philippines a country that is very important to many countries in the region, such as China and Japan. This also means that the Philippines is often a target for military intervention.
The Philippines is also a country that is facing many economic challenges. The country is a developing country, and it is facing many problems, such as poverty and inequality. This means that the country does not have the resources to preserve its democracy.
Why did the partition of British India cause a refugee crisis?
When the British left India in 1947, the country was divided into India and Pakistan along religious lines. This decision caused a massive refugee crisis, with millions of people fleeing their homes to escape violence and persecution.
There were several factors that led to the massive refugee crisis following the partition of British India. One of the main reasons was the violence that erupted between Hindus and Muslims in the lead-up to independence. Tensions had been high for years, and when the British announced their plans to leave, things quickly spiralled out of control.
In the months leading up to independence, there were numerous massacres and atrocities committed by both sides. Hindu mobs slaughtered Muslims, and vice versa, resulting in the displacement of millions of people.
Another factor that contributed to the refugee crisis was the fact that the borders between India and Pakistan were not clearly drawn. This led to a lot of confusion and chaos, as people were unsure which country they belonged to.
Adding to this, the British withdrew all military personnel from the region, leaving the borders completely unsecured. This allowed bands of armed bandits to roam around freely, terrorising civilians and causing even more displacement.
The final factor that contributed to the refugee crisis was the fact that the new governments in India and Pakistan were completely unprepared for the influx of people. They had no infrastructure in place to support the massive influx of refugees, and as a result, many people died from disease and starvation.
The partition of British India was one of the largest humanitarian crises of the 20th century. It resulted in the displacement of millions of people and the death of thousands. Despite this, the crisis has largely been forgotten, and the events that led to it are rarely taught in schools.
What were the consequences of independence in South Asia for the region and for the world?
The consequences of independence in South Asia for the region and for the world were vast and far-reaching. In 1947, after centuries of British rule, India and Pakistan gained their independence. The partition of the subcontinent into India and Pakistan was a bloody and chaotic affair, resulting in the mass displacement of millions of people and the deaths of hundreds of thousands. The region was plunged into decades of conflict, as India and Pakistan fought three wars and numerous skirmishes.
The consequences of independence in South Asia for the region were also economic. India and Pakistan embarked on radically different paths, with India adopting a socialist model while Pakistan became a conservative Muslim state. This led to a tense rivalry between the two countries, as each sought to outdo the other in terms of economic development and national security.
The consequences of independence in South Asia for the world were also significant. The Cold War was in full swing, and the subcontinent quickly became a key battleground between the United States and the Soviet Union. India aligned itself with the Soviet Union, while Pakistan became a close ally of the United States. This had a significant impact on the course of the Cold War, and helped to polarize the world into two rival blocs.
Why did policies toward ethnic diversity lead to prosperity in Malaysia?
The Malaysian government has long embraced a policy of ethnic diversity, which has been credited with leading to the country’s impressive prosperity. Here’s a look at why this policy has worked so well.
One of the main reasons why the Malaysian government’s policy of ethnic diversity has been so successful is that it has fostered a sense of tolerance and understanding between different ethnic groups. By encouraging different groups to interact and get to know each other, the government has helped to break down the barriers that can often exist between people of different races. This, in turn, has led to a more harmonious society and a more productive workforce.
In addition, the Malaysian government’s policy of ethnic diversity has helped to create a more diversified economy. This is because different ethnic groups have brought with them their own unique skills and talents, which have helped to contribute to the country’s overall economic growth.
Finally, the Malaysian government’s policy of ethnic diversity has been successful in creating a more stable and peaceful society. This is because it has helped to prevent the formation of ethnic rivalries and hostilities. By promoting cooperation and understanding between different groups, the government has helped to ensure that everyone in Malaysia can live together in peace and harmony.
How has Internet technology affected the method by which marriages are arranged among South Asians quizlet?
The role of the internet in the marriage process among South Asians has been both praised and criticized. On the one hand, the internet has made it easier for couples to connect with each other and to learn more about each other’s backgrounds. On the other hand, some people argue that the internet has made the process of finding a spouse too easy and that it has led to an increase in the number of divorces.
The use of the internet for finding a spouse first became popular among South Asians in the United Kingdom. In fact, a study found that almost half of all marriages between South Asians in the UK were arranged through the internet. This is in contrast to the United States, where only a small percentage of South Asian marriages are arranged through the internet.
There are a number of reasons why the internet has become a popular way to find a spouse among South Asians. For one, it allows couples to connect with each other from anywhere in the world. This is especially helpful for couples who are living in different countries. Additionally, the internet provides a way for couples to learn more about each other’s backgrounds. This is important, given that many South Asians place a lot of importance on family background and culture.
The internet has also made the process of finding a spouse easier. There are now a number of websites that cater to South Asian marriages. These websites allow couples to post their profiles and to search for potential matches. Additionally, the websites often have forums where couples can discuss their relationship and get advice from other couples.
Despite the benefits of the internet, there are also some criticisms of its role in the marriage process. One criticism is that the internet has made it too easy for people to find a spouse. This is because the websites that cater to South Asian marriages often have a large number of members. Additionally, the websites allow couples to communicate with each other easily. This can lead to relationships that are not as strong as those that are formed through traditional methods of courtship.
Another criticism of the internet is that it has led to an increase in the number of divorces. This is because the internet allows couples to connect with each other easily and to make decisions about their relationship quickly. Additionally, the internet makes it easy for couples to get divorced. This is because the process of getting a divorce online is much simpler than the process of getting a divorce through the court system.
Despite the criticisms of the internet, it is clear that the internet has had a significant impact on the way in which South Asians find spouses. The internet has made it easier for couples to connect with each other and to learn more about each other’s backgrounds. Additionally, the internet has made the process of finding a spouse easier.
How did the Indian government try to improve conditions for lower castes quizlet?
The Indian government has been trying to improve the conditions for lower castes for many years. One way they have tried to do this is by implementing quotas in government jobs and educational institutions. They have also worked to increase the number of lower caste people in parliament.